Justine Henin vs Lindsay Davenport — Australian Open Quarter-final
Australian Open · WTA · Quarter-final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 January 2006 ·
hard
Henin J.2-6 6-2 6-3
Davenport L.
Henin J.
2662
Davenport L.
6231
Justine Henin defeated Lindsay Davenport 2-6 6-2 6-3 in the Australian Open quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Justine Henin came in leading the head-to-head 6–5. Justine Henin extended the head-to-head to 7–5.
Key context
- Match story: Justine Henin dropped the opening set before beating Lindsay Davenport 2–6 6–2 6–3.
Head to head
6–5| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-08-28 | US Open | QF | hard | Justine Henin | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2006-08-21 | New Haven | F | hard | Justine Henin | 6-0 1-0 |
| 2005-04-11 | Charleston | QF | clay | Justine Henin | 3-6 6-3 1-0 |
| 2004-03-10 | Indian Wells | F | hard | Justine Henin | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2004-01-19 | Australian Open | QF | hard | Justine Henin | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2003-01-13 | Australian Open | R16 | hard | Justine Henin | 7-5 5-7 9-7 |
| 2002-10-14 | Zurich | SF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2001-10-08 | Filderstadt | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2000-08-22 | US Open | R16 | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-0 6-4 |
| 2000-08-14 | Montreal | R32 | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 3-6 7-6 6-2 |
| 1999-05-24 | Roland Garros | R64 | clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 2-6 7-5 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
55%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
49%
48%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
5.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.3
3.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 52). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
81
68
Break points saved·Slight edge
73
64
Break points won·Clear edge
91
78
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
77
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
78
67
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast