Justine Henin vs Lindsay Davenport — Australian Open Quarter-final
Australian Open · WTA · Quarter-final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 January 2004 ·
hard
Henin J.7-5 6-3
Davenport L.
Henin J.
762
Davenport L.
530
Justine Henin defeated Lindsay Davenport 7-5 6-3 in the Australian Open quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Justine Henin came in leading the head-to-head 6–5, defending last year's semi-final. Justine Henin extended the head-to-head to 7–5.
Key context
- Match story: Justine Henin closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.
Head to head
6–5| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-08-28 | US Open | QF | hard | Justine Henin | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2006-08-21 | New Haven | F | hard | Justine Henin | 6-0 1-0 |
| 2006-01-16 | Australian Open | QF | hard | Justine Henin | 2-6 6-2 6-3 |
| 2005-04-11 | Charleston | QF | clay | Justine Henin | 3-6 6-3 1-0 |
| 2004-03-10 | Indian Wells | F | hard | Justine Henin | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2003-01-13 | Australian Open | R16 | hard | Justine Henin | 7-5 5-7 9-7 |
| 2002-10-14 | Zurich | SF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2001-10-08 | Filderstadt | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2000-08-22 | US Open | R16 | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-0 6-4 |
| 2000-08-14 | Montreal | R32 | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 3-6 7-6 6-2 |
| 1999-05-24 | Roland Garros | R64 | clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 2-6 7-5 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
50%
48%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.5
4.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
81
68
Break points saved·Slight edge
73
64
Break points won·Clear edge
91
78
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
77
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
78
67
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast