Lindsay Davenport vs Justine Henin — Montreal Round of 32
Montreal · WTA · Round of 32
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2000 ·
hard
Davenport L.3-6 7-6 6-2
Henin J.
Davenport L.
3762
Henin J.
6621
Lindsay Davenport defeated Justine Henin 3-6 7-6 6-2 in the Montreal round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Justine Henin came in leading the head-to-head 7–4. Lindsay Davenport narrowed the head-to-head to 7–5.
Key context
- Match story: Lindsay Davenport dropped the opening set before beating Justine Henin 3–6 7–6 6–2.
Head to head
4–7| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-08-28 | US Open | QF | hard | Justine Henin | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2006-08-21 | New Haven | F | hard | Justine Henin | 6-0 1-0 |
| 2006-01-16 | Australian Open | QF | hard | Justine Henin | 2-6 6-2 6-3 |
| 2005-04-11 | Charleston | QF | clay | Justine Henin | 3-6 6-3 1-0 |
| 2004-03-10 | Indian Wells | F | hard | Justine Henin | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2004-01-19 | Australian Open | QF | hard | Justine Henin | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2003-01-13 | Australian Open | R16 | hard | Justine Henin | 7-5 5-7 9-7 |
| 2002-10-14 | Zurich | SF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2001-10-08 | Filderstadt | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2000-08-22 | US Open | R16 | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-0 6-4 |
| 1999-05-24 | Roland Garros | R64 | clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 2-6 7-5 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
48%
49%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
4.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (116 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
68
81
Break points saved·Slight edge
64
73
Break points won·Clear edge
78
91
Deciding sets·Slight edge
77
85
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
67
78
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast