Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Dominika Cibulkova — Indian Wells Round of 16
Indian Wells · WTA · Round of 16
#426WTA
1775ELO
1742Hard ELO
35 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2017 ·
hard
Pavlyuchenkova A.6-4 3-6 6-2
Cibulkova D.
Pavlyuchenkova A.
6362
Cibulkova D.
4621
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova defeated Dominika Cibulkova 6-4 3-6 6-2 in the Indian Wells round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dominika Cibulkova came in leading the head-to-head 6–3, defending last year's round of 64. Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova narrowed the head-to-head to 6–4.
Key context
- Match story: Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–2.
Head to head
3–6| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-21 | Strasbourg | F | clay | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-7 7-6 7-6 |
| 2018-02-12 | Doha | R64 | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2017-08-21 | New Haven | QF | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2017-02-13 | Doha | R16 | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-5 2-6 6-2 |
| 2016-10-10 | Linz | QF | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2016-05-02 | Madrid | R16 | clay | Dominika Cibulkova | 2-6 6-3 7-5 |
| 2014-08-11 | Cincinnati | R64 | hard | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2010-10-18 | Moscow | R32 | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-6 2-6 6-0 |
| 2010-09-27 | Tokyo | R64 | hard | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 7-5 7-5 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.4
3.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 108). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
74
77
Break points saved·Slight edge
45
56
Break points won·Even
95
96
Deciding sets·Slight edge
90
83
Tiebreaks·Even
85
87
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast