Dominika Cibulkova vs Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova — Linz Quarter-final
Linz · WTA · Quarter-final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2016 ·
hard
#426WTA
1775ELO
1742Hard ELO
35 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Cibulkova D.7-6 6-4
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Cibulkova D.
762
Pavlyuchenkova A.
640
Dominika Cibulkova defeated Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova 7-6 6-4 in the Linz quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Dominika Cibulkova came in leading the head-to-head 5–4. Dominika Cibulkova extended the head-to-head to 6–4.
Key context
- Match story: Dominika Cibulkova edged Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in two tight sets (7–6 6–4).
Head to head
5–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-21 | Strasbourg | F | clay | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-7 7-6 7-6 |
| 2018-02-12 | Doha | R64 | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2017-08-21 | New Haven | QF | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2017-03-06 | Indian Wells | R16 | hard | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-4 3-6 6-2 |
| 2017-02-13 | Doha | R16 | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-5 2-6 6-2 |
| 2016-05-02 | Madrid | R16 | clay | Dominika Cibulkova | 2-6 6-3 7-5 |
| 2014-08-11 | Cincinnati | R64 | hard | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2010-10-18 | Moscow | R32 | hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 7-6 2-6 6-0 |
| 2010-09-27 | Tokyo | R64 | hard | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 7-5 7-5 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
66%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
57%
58%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.0
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
4.4
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (192 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
77
74
Break points saved·Slight edge
56
45
Break points won·Even
96
95
Deciding sets·Slight edge
83
90
Tiebreaks·Even
87
85
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast