John Isner vs Kevin Anderson — Cincinnati Masters Round of 64
Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 64
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 10 August 2014 ·
hard
Isner J.6-3 6-4
Anderson K.
Isner J.
662
Anderson K.
340
John Isner defeated Kevin Anderson 6-3 6-4 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — John Isner came in leading the head-to-head 8–4, defending last year's final. John Isner extended the head-to-head to 9–4.
Key context
- Match story: John Isner closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.
Head to head
8–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-07 | Dallas | R16 | hard | John Isner | 7-6 6-7 7-6 |
| 2018-07-02 | Wimbledon | SF | grass | Kevin Anderson | 7-6 6-7 6-7 6-4 26-24 |
| 2015-03-12 | Indian Wells Masters | R32 | hard | John Isner | 7-6 6-2 |
| 2013-07-22 | Atlanta | F | hard | John Isner | 6-7 7-6 7-6 |
| 2013-02-25 | Delray Beach | QF | hard | John Isner | 6-2 7-6 |
| 2012-10-07 | Shanghai Masters | R32 | hard | John Isner | 7-6 6-7 7-6 |
| 2012-02-27 | Delray Beach | SF | hard | Kevin Anderson | 7-5 7-6 |
| 2011-03-23 | Miami Masters | R16 | hard | Kevin Anderson | 6-3 7-6 |
| 2010-07-19 | Atlanta | SF | hard | John Isner | 6-3 6-7 6-3 |
| 2010-03-11 | Indian Wells Masters | R64 | hard | John Isner | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2008-06-09 | Queen's Club | R64 | grass | John Isner | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2008-03-03 | Las Vegas | R16 | hard | Kevin Anderson | 7-6 7-5 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
80%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
56%
53%
Service points won·Even
73%
70%
Return points won·Even
29%
33%
Break points saved·Even
70%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
21.7
15.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
61
62
Break points saved·Even
99
97
Break points won·Slight edge
0
5
Deciding sets·Even
91
92
Tiebreaks·Even
96
94
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast