Xavier Malisse vs Tommy Haas — Memphis Round of 32
Memphis · ATP · Round of 32
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 February 2010 ·
hard
Malisse X.6-4 3-6 6-4
Haas T.
Malisse X.
6362
Haas T.
4641
Xavier Malisse defeated Tommy Haas 6-4 3-6 6-4 in the Memphis round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tommy Haas came in leading the head-to-head 9–3, defending last year's round of 32. Xavier Malisse narrowed the head-to-head to 9–4.
Key context
- Match story: Xavier Malisse closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–4.
Head to head
3–9| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-01-30 | Delray Beach | F | hard | Tommy Haas | 6-3 3-6 7-6 |
| 2005-07-25 | Los Angeles | R16 | hard | Xavier Malisse | 1-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2005-02-14 | Memphis | QF | hard | Tommy Haas | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-2 6-3 |
| 2004-11-01 | Paris Masters | R32 | hard | Tommy Haas | 6-1 7-6 |
| 2004-10-18 | Madrid Masters | R64 | clay | Tommy Haas | 6-4 6-1 |
| 2004-06-21 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Xavier Malisse | 3-6 6-3 6-2 6-4 |
| 2004-04-19 | Monte Carlo Masters | R64 | clay | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2001-10-29 | Paris Masters | R16 | hard | Tommy Haas | 7-5 6-1 |
| 2001-02-26 | San Jose | QF | hard | Xavier Malisse | 5-7 6-3 5-1 |
| 2001-01-01 | Adelaide | R16 | hard | Tommy Haas | 7-5 6-3 |
| 1999-08-09 | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | hard | Tommy Haas | 7-5 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
57%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.8
5.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.4
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
38
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
87
Break points won·Clear edge
42
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
50
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
58
89
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast