Tommy Haas vs Xavier Malisse — Paris Masters Round of 32
Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 November 2004 ·
hard
Haas T.6-1 7-6
Malisse X.
Haas T.
672
Malisse X.
160
Tommy Haas defeated Xavier Malisse 6-1 7-6 in the Paris Masters round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tommy Haas came in leading the head-to-head 8–4. Tommy Haas extended the head-to-head to 9–4.
Key context
- Match story: Tommy Haas came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.
Head to head
8–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-02-15 | Memphis | R32 | hard | Xavier Malisse | 6-4 3-6 6-4 |
| 2006-01-30 | Delray Beach | F | hard | Tommy Haas | 6-3 3-6 7-6 |
| 2005-07-25 | Los Angeles | R16 | hard | Xavier Malisse | 1-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2005-02-14 | Memphis | QF | hard | Tommy Haas | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-2 6-3 |
| 2004-10-18 | Madrid Masters | R64 | clay | Tommy Haas | 6-4 6-1 |
| 2004-06-21 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Xavier Malisse | 3-6 6-3 6-2 6-4 |
| 2004-04-19 | Monte Carlo Masters | R64 | clay | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2001-10-29 | Paris Masters | R16 | hard | Tommy Haas | 7-5 6-1 |
| 2001-02-26 | San Jose | QF | hard | Xavier Malisse | 5-7 6-3 5-1 |
| 2001-01-01 | Adelaide | R16 | hard | Tommy Haas | 7-5 6-3 |
| 1999-08-09 | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | hard | Tommy Haas | 7-5 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
6.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
2.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
58
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
87
68
Break points won·Clear edge
25
42
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
50
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
58
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast