Arnaud Clement vs Thomas Johansson — Cincinnati Masters Round of 64
Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 64
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2008 ·
hard
Clement A.7-6 6-7 6-3
Johansson T.
Clement A.
7662
Johansson T.
6731
Arnaud Clement defeated Thomas Johansson 7-6 6-7 6-3 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Thomas Johansson came in leading the head-to-head 6–5. Arnaud Clement narrowed the head-to-head to 6–6.
Key context
- Match story: Arnaud Clement closed it out in three sets, 7–6 6–7 6–3.
Head to head
5–6| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08-27 | US Open | R64 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 7-6 6-7 7-6 |
| 2007-07-29 | Washington | R32 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 1-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2007-06-18 | Nottingham | R32 | grass | Arnaud Clement | 7-5 6-2 |
| 2004-01-05 | Adelaide | R16 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2002-05-27 | Roland Garros | R64 | clay | Arnaud Clement | 7-6 6-1 6-3 |
| 2002-05-06 | Rome Masters | R64 | clay | Arnaud Clement | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2002-03-18 | Miami Masters | R64 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2002-02-18 | Rotterdam | R16 | hard | Arnaud Clement | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2000-03-13 | Indian Wells Masters | R64 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-1 6-3 |
| 1999-08-16 | Indianapolis | R32 | hard | Arnaud Clement | 6-3 6-2 |
| 1998-07-06 | Bastad | R32 | clay | Thomas Johansson | 7-5 6-1 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
57%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
6.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
28
45
Break points saved·Even
64
68
Break points won·Clear edge
30
49
Deciding sets·Clear edge
52
65
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
33
51
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast