Arnaud Clement vs Thomas Johansson — Rome Masters Round of 64

Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 64
FRA
Arnaud Clement
48 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2002 ·
clay
SWE
Thomas Johansson
51 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLLWL
Clement A.
6-4 6-4
Johansson T.
Clement A.
662
Johansson T.
440

Arnaud Clement defeated Thomas Johansson 6-4 6-4 in the Rome Masters round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Thomas Johansson came in leading the head-to-head 6–5, defending last year's round of 64. Arnaud Clement narrowed the head-to-head to 6–6.

Key context

  • Match story: Arnaud Clement edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

5–6
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2008-07-28Cincinnati MastersR64hardArnaud Clement7-6 6-7 6-3
2007-08-27US OpenR64hardThomas Johansson6-4 7-6 6-7 7-6
2007-07-29WashingtonR32hardThomas Johansson1-6 6-3 6-4
2007-06-18NottinghamR32grassArnaud Clement7-5 6-2
2004-01-05AdelaideR16hardThomas Johansson6-4 6-3
2002-05-27Roland GarrosR64clayArnaud Clement7-6 6-1 6-3
2002-03-18Miami MastersR64hardThomas Johansson6-3 6-4
2002-02-18RotterdamR16hardArnaud Clement6-2 6-3
2000-03-13Indian Wells MastersR64hardThomas Johansson6-1 6-3
1999-08-16IndianapolisR32hardArnaud Clement6-3 6-2
1998-07-06BastadR32clayThomas Johansson7-5 6-1

Statistics

This season
Clement A.Johansson T.
1st serve in·Even
57%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.2
8.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clement A.Johansson T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
45
Break points saved·Even
64
68
Break points won·Clear edge
30
49
Deciding sets·Clear edge
52
65
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
33
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw