Andy Roddick vs Fernando Verdasco — USA vs ESP Round Robin
USA vs ESP · ATP · Round Robin
3 — 0
Sets
Friday, 6 April 2007 ·
grass
Roddick A.7-6 6-1 6-4
Verdasco F.
Roddick A.
7663
Verdasco F.
6140
Andy Roddick defeated Fernando Verdasco 7-6 6-1 6-4 in the USA vs ESP round robin on grass. The result followed the form book — Andy Roddick came in leading the head-to-head 8–3. Andy Roddick extended the head-to-head to 9–3.
Key context
- Match story: Andy Roddick came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1 6–4.
Head to head
8–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-06-10 | London | QF | carpet | Andy Roddick | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2011-06-06 | Queen's Club | QF | grass | Andy Roddick | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2010-02-08 | San Jose | F | hard | Fernando Verdasco | 3-6 6-4 6-4 |
| 2009-08-10 | Canada Masters | R16 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 4-6 7-6 |
| 2007-08-13 | Cincinnati Masters | R32 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 6-2 |
| 2007-06-25 | Wimbledon | R32 | grass | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-4 7-6 |
| 2006-08-28 | US Open | R32 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-7 6-3 6-4 6-7 6-2 |
| 2006-03-20 | Miami Masters | R32 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2005-05-02 | Rome Masters | R16 | clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-7 7-6 6-4 |
| 2005-03-21 | Miami Masters | R64 | hard | Fernando Verdasco | 7-6 4-3 |
| 2003-08-11 | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
56%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
71%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.8
5.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.4
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
58
44
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
92
Break points won·Slight edge
21
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
88
55
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About