Fernando Verdasco vs Andy Roddick — San Jose Final
San Jose · ATP · Final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 February 2010 ·
hard
Verdasco F.3-6 6-4 6-4
Roddick A.
Verdasco F.
3662
Roddick A.
6441
Fernando Verdasco defeated Andy Roddick 3-6 6-4 6-4 in the San Jose final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Andy Roddick came in leading the head-to-head 9–2, defending last year's semi-final. Fernando Verdasco narrowed the head-to-head to 9–3.
Key context
- Match story: Fernando Verdasco dropped the opening set before beating Andy Roddick 3–6 6–4 6–4.
Head to head
2–9| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-06-10 | London | QF | carpet | Andy Roddick | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2011-06-06 | Queen's Club | QF | grass | Andy Roddick | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2009-08-10 | Canada Masters | R16 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 4-6 7-6 |
| 2007-08-13 | Cincinnati Masters | R32 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 6-2 |
| 2007-06-25 | Wimbledon | R32 | grass | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-4 7-6 |
| 2007-04-06 | Davis Cup WG QF: USA vs ESP | RR | grass | Andy Roddick | 7-6 6-1 6-4 |
| 2006-08-28 | US Open | R32 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-7 6-3 6-4 6-7 6-2 |
| 2006-03-20 | Miami Masters | R32 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2005-05-02 | Rome Masters | R16 | clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-7 7-6 6-4 |
| 2005-03-21 | Miami Masters | R64 | hard | Fernando Verdasco | 7-6 4-3 |
| 2003-08-11 | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
64%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
77%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
70%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.5
11.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 150). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
44
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
83
Break points won·Slight edge
27
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
55
88
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About