Jonas Bjorkman vs Thomas Johansson — Wimbledon Round of 128
Wimbledon · ATP · Round of 128
3 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2006 ·
grass
Bjorkman J.3-6 7-6 6-1 6-1
Johansson T.
Bjorkman J.
37663
Johansson T.
66111
Jonas Bjorkman defeated Thomas Johansson 3-6 7-6 6-1 6-1 in the Wimbledon round of 128 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Thomas Johansson came in leading the head-to-head 6–4, defending last year's semi-final. Jonas Bjorkman narrowed the head-to-head to 6–5.
Key context
- Match story: Jonas Bjorkman dropped the opening set before beating Thomas Johansson 3–6 7–6 6–1 6–1.
Head to head
4–6| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-09-12 | Beijing | R32 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2005-03-07 | Indian Wells Masters | R64 | hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 4-6 6-3 7-6 |
| 2002-05-13 | Hamburg Masters | R64 | clay | Thomas Johansson | 6-7 6-3 6-3 |
| 2002-01-14 | Australian Open | QF | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-0 2-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2001-06-11 | Halle | QF | grass | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2000-11-20 | Stockholm | QF | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-7 7-6 7-5 |
| 1998-10-26 | Stuttgart Masters | R16 | carpet | Jonas Bjorkman | 2-6 6-4 6-2 |
| 1998-02-16 | Antwerp | R32 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-1 6-2 |
| 1997-11-03 | Stockholm | R16 | hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-4 7-5 |
| 1997-10-27 | Paris Masters | R32 | hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 6-7 7-6 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
8.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (87 vs 106). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
34
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
48
68
Break points won·Even
49
49
Deciding sets·Slight edge
56
65
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
58
51
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast