Jonas Bjorkman vs Thomas Johansson — Stuttgart Masters Round of 16
Stuttgart Masters · ATP · Round of 16
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 October 1998 ·
carpet
Bjorkman J.2-6 6-4 6-2
Johansson T.
Bjorkman J.
2662
Johansson T.
6421
Jonas Bjorkman defeated Thomas Johansson 2-6 6-4 6-2 in the Stuttgart Masters round of 16 on carpet. The upset overturned the form book — Thomas Johansson came in leading the head-to-head 6–4, defending last year's round of 64. Jonas Bjorkman narrowed the head-to-head to 6–5.
Key context
- Match story: Jonas Bjorkman dropped the opening set before beating Thomas Johansson 2–6 6–4 6–2.
Head to head
4–6| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-06-26 | Wimbledon | R128 | grass | Jonas Bjorkman | 3-6 7-6 6-1 6-1 |
| 2005-09-12 | Beijing | R32 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2005-03-07 | Indian Wells Masters | R64 | hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 4-6 6-3 7-6 |
| 2002-05-13 | Hamburg Masters | R64 | clay | Thomas Johansson | 6-7 6-3 6-3 |
| 2002-01-14 | Australian Open | QF | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-0 2-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2001-06-11 | Halle | QF | grass | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2000-11-20 | Stockholm | QF | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-7 7-6 7-5 |
| 1998-02-16 | Antwerp | R32 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-1 6-2 |
| 1997-11-03 | Stockholm | R16 | hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-4 7-5 |
| 1997-10-27 | Paris Masters | R32 | hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 6-7 7-6 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
58%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
8.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
34
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
48
68
Break points won·Even
49
49
Deciding sets·Slight edge
56
65
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
58
51
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About