Kim Clijsters vs Lindsay Davenport — Stanford Semi-final
Stanford · WTA · Semi-final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2002 ·
hard
Clijsters K.4-6 6-4 6-2
Davenport L.
Clijsters K.
4662
Davenport L.
6421
Kim Clijsters defeated Lindsay Davenport 4-6 6-4 6-2 in the Stanford semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Kim Clijsters came in leading the head-to-head 8–7, defending the title. Kim Clijsters extended the head-to-head to 9–7.
Key context
- Match story: Kim Clijsters dropped the opening set before beating Lindsay Davenport 4–6 6–4 6–2.
Head to head
8–7| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06-20 | Wimbledon | R16 | grass | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-7 6-3 |
| 2005-05-23 | Roland Garros | R16 | clay | Lindsay Davenport | 1-6 7-5 6-3 |
| 2005-03-09 | Indian Wells | F | hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-4 4-6 6-2 |
| 2003-08-25 | US Open | SF | hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2003-08-04 | Los Angeles | F | hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-1 3-6 6-1 |
| 2003-07-28 | San Diego | SF | hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2003-03-05 | Indian Wells | F | hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2003-01-06 | Sydney | F | hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2002-10-14 | Zurich | QF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 7-6 |
| 2002-10-07 | Filderstadt | QF | hard | Kim Clijsters | 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2001-10-30 | WTA Tour Championships | SF | carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 1-6 6-3 7-6 |
| 2001-07-23 | Stanford | F | hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-4 6-7 6-1 |
| 2001-06-25 | Wimbledon | QF | grass | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-2 |
| 2001-01-15 | Australian Open | R16 | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-4 6-0 |
| 2000-08-22 | US Open | R64 | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 4-6 6-2 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
48%
48%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.4
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
4.1
3.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
77
68
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
64
Break points won·Slight edge
86
78
Deciding sets·Even
80
77
Tiebreaks·Even
71
67
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast