Lindsay Davenport vs Kim ClijstersAustralian Open Round of 16

Australian Open · WTA · Round of 16
50 yrs · 189 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2001 ·
hard
43 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWW
Davenport L.
6-4 6-0
Clijsters K.
Davenport L.
662
Clijsters K.
400

Lindsay Davenport defeated Kim Clijsters 6-4 6-0 in the Australian Open round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kim Clijsters came in leading the head-to-head 9–6, defending last year's round of 128. Lindsay Davenport narrowed the head-to-head to 9–7.

Key context

Head to head

69
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2005-06-20WimbledonR16grassLindsay Davenport6-3 6-7 6-3
2005-05-23Roland GarrosR16clayLindsay Davenport1-6 7-5 6-3
2005-03-09Indian WellsFhardKim Clijsters6-4 4-6 6-2
2003-08-25US OpenSFhardKim Clijsters6-2 6-3
2003-08-04Los AngelesFhardKim Clijsters6-1 3-6 6-1
2003-07-28San DiegoSFhardKim Clijsters6-3 6-3
2003-03-05Indian WellsFhardKim Clijsters6-4 7-5
2003-01-06SydneyFhardKim Clijsters6-4 6-3
2002-10-14ZurichQFhardLindsay Davenport6-3 7-6
2002-10-07FilderstadtQFhardKim Clijsters4-6 6-3 6-4
2002-07-22StanfordSFhardKim Clijsters4-6 6-4 6-2
2001-10-30WTA Tour ChampionshipsSFcarpetLindsay Davenport1-6 6-3 7-6
2001-07-23StanfordFhardKim Clijsters6-4 6-7 6-1
2001-06-25WimbledonQFgrassLindsay Davenport6-1 6-2
2000-08-22US OpenR64hardLindsay Davenport4-6 6-2 6-2

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
48%
48%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (116 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
68
77
Break points saved·Clear edge
64
76
Break points won·Slight edge
78
86
Deciding sets·Even
77
80
Tiebreaks·Even
67
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw