Lindsay Davenport vs Amelie Mauresmo — Tokyo Quarter-final
Tokyo · WTA · Quarter-final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 September 1999 ·
hard
Davenport L.6-1 6-1
Mauresmo A.
Davenport L.
662
Mauresmo A.
110
Lindsay Davenport defeated Amelie Mauresmo 6-1 6-1 in the Tokyo quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Lindsay Davenport came in leading the head-to-head 11–4, defending the title. Lindsay Davenport extended the head-to-head to 12–4.
Key context
- Match story: Lindsay Davenport dropped just 2 games past Amelie Mauresmo.
Head to head
11–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-09-18 | Beijing | QF | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2006-08-21 | New Haven | QF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2005-10-03 | Filderstadt | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 6-4 |
| 2005-08-22 | New Haven | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2005-06-20 | Wimbledon | SF | grass | Lindsay Davenport | 6-7 7-6 6-4 |
| 2004-10-04 | Filderstadt | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 |
| 2004-04-05 | Amelia Island | F | clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2002-08-19 | New Haven | QF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 7-6 6-3 |
| 2001-10-08 | Filderstadt | QF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2001-08-19 | New Haven | QF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2000-01-07 | Sydney | F | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 7-6 6-4 |
| 1999-11-15 | WTA Tour Championships | R16 | carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
| 1999-08-23 | New Haven | QF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-2 |
| 1999-01-18 | Australian Open | SF | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 4-6 7-5 7-5 |
| 1998-05-11 | Berlin | R16 | grass | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-2 6-4 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
46%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
4.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (116 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
68
74
Break points saved·Even
64
68
Break points won·Even
78
82
Deciding sets·Slight edge
77
85
Tiebreaks·Even
67
70
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast