Amelie Mauresmo vs Lindsay DavenportAustralian Open Semi-final

Australian Open · WTA · Semi-final
47 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 January 1999 ·
hard
50 yrs · 189 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWW
Mauresmo A.
4-6 7-5 7-5
Davenport L.
Mauresmo A.
4772
Davenport L.
6551

Amelie Mauresmo defeated Lindsay Davenport 4-6 7-5 7-5 in the Australian Open semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lindsay Davenport came in leading the head-to-head 12–3, defending last year's semi-final. Amelie Mauresmo narrowed the head-to-head to 12–4.

Key context

Head to head

312
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2006-09-18BeijingQFhardAmelie Mauresmo6-4 6-3
2006-08-21New HavenQFhardLindsay Davenport6-4 7-5
2005-10-03FilderstadtFhardLindsay Davenport6-2 6-4
2005-08-22New HavenFhardLindsay Davenport6-4 6-4
2005-06-20WimbledonSFgrassLindsay Davenport6-7 7-6 6-4
2004-10-04FilderstadtFhardLindsay Davenport6-2
2004-04-05Amelia IslandFclayLindsay Davenport6-4 6-4
2002-08-19New HavenQFhardLindsay Davenport7-6 6-3
2001-10-08FilderstadtQFhardLindsay Davenport6-4 6-2
2001-08-19New HavenQFhardLindsay Davenport6-4 6-4
2000-01-07SydneyFhardAmelie Mauresmo7-6 6-4
1999-11-15WTA Tour ChampionshipsR16carpetLindsay Davenport3-6 6-3 6-2
1999-09-20TokyoQFhardLindsay Davenport6-1 6-1
1999-08-23New HavenQFhardLindsay Davenport6-1 6-2
1998-05-11BerlinR16grassAmelie Mauresmo6-2 6-4

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
46%
48%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.5
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
74
68
Break points saved·Even
68
64
Break points won·Even
82
78
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
77
Tiebreaks·Even
70
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw