Richard Gasquet vs Roberto Bautista Agut — Cincinnati Masters Quarter-final
Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Quarter-final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2019 ·
hard
#183ATP
1700ELO
1668Hard ELO
$442kYTD
$20MCAREER
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLL
Gasquet R.7-6 3-6 6-2
Bautista Agut R.
Gasquet R.
7362
Bautista Agut R.
6621
Richard Gasquet defeated Roberto Bautista Agut 7-6 3-6 6-2 in the Cincinnati Masters quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Roberto Bautista Agut came in leading the head-to-head 8–1. Richard Gasquet narrowed the head-to-head to 8–2.
Key context
- Match story: Richard Gasquet closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–2.
Head to head
1–8| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-05 | Marseille | R32 | hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2020-09-28 | Roland Garros | R128 | clay | Roberto Bautista Agut | 7-6 6-2 6-1 |
| 2020-08-24 | Cincinnati Masters | R32 | hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 7-5 6-1 |
| 2019-10-21 | Basel | R16 | hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-2 4-6 6-3 |
| 2019-08-05 | Canada Masters | R16 | hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 7-5 7-5 |
| 2019-06-17 | Halle | R16 | grass | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2015-10-05 | Tokyo | R32 | hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-4 6-1 |
| 2015-02-23 | Dubai | R16 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 3-6 7-6 |
| 2014-10-27 | Paris Masters | R32 | hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-4 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.8
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.8
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
67
78
Break points saved·Even
93
94
Break points won·Dominant
32
57
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
93
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
94
89
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast