Kenny De Schepper vs Sergiy Stakhovsky — Paris Masters Qualifying Round 2
Paris Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2014 ·
hard
De Schepper K.6-7 7-6 7-5
Stakhovsky S.
De Schepper K.
6772
Stakhovsky S.
7651
Kenny De Schepper defeated Sergiy Stakhovsky 6-7 7-6 7-5 in the Paris Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sergiy Stakhovsky came in leading the head-to-head 9–0. Kenny De Schepper claimed a first win over Sergiy Stakhovsky in ten meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 9–1.
Key context
- Match story: Kenny De Schepper dropped the opening set before beating Sergiy Stakhovsky 6–7 7–6 7–5.
Head to head
0–9| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-14 | Australian Open | Q1 | hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 4-6 6-3 |
| 2019-01-08 | Australian Open | Q128 | hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 4-6 6-3 |
| 2018-10-15 | Antwerp | Q1 | hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2017-07-03 | Wimbledon | Q1 | grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2017-06-26 | Wimbledon | Q128 | grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2017-05-29 | Roland Garros | Q1 | clay | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-4 3-6 7-6 |
| 2017-05-22 | Roland Garros | Q128 | clay | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-4 3-6 7-6(2) |
| 2014-01-06 | Sydney | Q1 | hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2014-01-04 | Sydney | Q32 | hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
7.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
1
7
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
69
Break points won·Even
6
2
Deciding sets·Clear edge
9
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
7
27
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast