Denis Istomin vs Andreas Seppi — US Open Round of 32
US Open · ATP · Round of 32
3 — 2
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2013 ·
hard
Istomin D.6-3 6-4 2-6 3-6 6-1
Seppi A.
Istomin D.
662363
Seppi A.
346612
Denis Istomin defeated Andreas Seppi 6-3 6-4 2-6 3-6 6-1 in the US Open round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Andreas Seppi came in leading the head-to-head 7–3, defending last year's round of 128. Denis Istomin narrowed the head-to-head to 7–4.
Key context
- Match story: Denis Istomin came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–3 6–4 2–6 3–6 6–1.
Head to head
3–7| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-25 | Eastbourne | R32 | grass | Denis Istomin | 6-3 6-7 7-6 |
| 2016-01-11 | Sydney | R32 | hard | Andreas Seppi | 6-4 4-6 6-2 |
| 2015-01-19 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | Andreas Seppi | 5-7 6-3 2-6 6-1 6-4 |
| 2014-05-18 | Dusseldorf | QF | clay | Denis Istomin | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2013-06-24 | Wimbledon | R128 | grass | Andreas Seppi | 7-6 7-6 5-7 3-6 6-3 |
| 2013-01-14 | Australian Open | R64 | hard | Andreas Seppi | 7-6 5-7 6-7 7-6 6-2 |
| 2012-06-25 | Wimbledon | R128 | grass | Denis Istomin | 6-7 6-4 3-6 6-3 8-6 |
| 2012-05-13 | Rome Masters | R64 | clay | Andreas Seppi | 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
| 2011-07-31 | Kitzbuhel | R32 | clay | Andreas Seppi | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2011-01-10 | Sydney | R32 | hard | Andreas Seppi | 6-1 6-0 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Even
5.0
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
15
42
Break points saved·Even
84
83
Break points won·Dominant
6
44
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
55
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
28
33
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast