Feliciano Lopez vs Fernando Verdasco — Eastbourne Quarter-final
Eastbourne · ATP · Quarter-final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2013 ·
grass
Lopez F.6-4 7-6
Verdasco F.
Lopez F.
672
Verdasco F.
460
Feliciano Lopez defeated Fernando Verdasco 6-4 7-6 in the Eastbourne quarter-final on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Fernando Verdasco came in leading the head-to-head 6–5. Feliciano Lopez narrowed the head-to-head to 6–6.
Key context
- Match story: Feliciano Lopez edged Fernando Verdasco in two tight sets (6–4 7–6).
Head to head
5–6| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-22 | Barcelona | R64 | clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2018-08-27 | US Open | R128 | hard | Fernando Verdasco | 6-2 7-5 6-4 |
| 2017-08-28 | US Open | R64 | hard | Feliciano Lopez | 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-1 |
| 2015-02-02 | Quito | SF | clay | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2009-08-10 | Canada Masters | R64 | hard | Fernando Verdasco | 6-1 6-7 6-1 |
| 2009-03-25 | Miami Masters | R32 | hard | Fernando Verdasco | 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2008-01-07 | Sydney | R32 | hard | Fernando Verdasco | 6-3 4-6 6-2 |
| 2005-08-22 | New Haven | QF | hard | Feliciano Lopez | 6-4 1-6 6-2 |
| 2005-02-07 | Marseille | R32 | hard | Feliciano Lopez | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2004-07-19 | Kitzbuhel | QF | clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-2 6-3 |
| 1999-06-04 | Spain 6 Masters 3 | SF | clay | Feliciano Lopez | 4-6 6-1 6-4 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.7
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.4
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
53
44
Break points saved·Even
96
92
Break points won·Dominant
1
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
55
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast