Petra Kvitova vs Carla Suarez Navarro — Australian Open Round of 64
Australian Open · WTA · Round of 64
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 January 2012 ·
hard
Kvitova P.6-2 2-6 6-4
Suarez Navarro C.
Kvitova P.
6262
Suarez Navarro C.
2641
Petra Kvitova defeated Carla Suarez Navarro 6-2 2-6 6-4 in the Australian Open round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Carla Suarez Navarro came in leading the head-to-head 6–5, defending last year's round of 64. Petra Kvitova narrowed the head-to-head to 6–6.
Key context
- Match story: Petra Kvitova closed it out in three sets, 6–2 2–6 6–4.
Head to head
5–6| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-24 | Doha | R32 | hard | Petra Kvitova | 4-6 6-3 6-0 |
| 2018-08-20 | New Haven | QF | hard | Carla Suarez Navarro | 6-3 0-0 |
| 2017-08-07 | Toronto | R64 | hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-1 7-6 |
| 2015-05-11 | Rome | QF | clay | Carla Suarez Navarro | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2015-02-23 | Doha | QF | hard | Carla Suarez Navarro | 3-6 6-0 6-3 |
| 2015-02-16 | Dubai | R16 | hard | Carla Suarez Navarro | 6-3 4-6 6-3 |
| 2014-02-17 | Dubai | R16 | hard | Carla Suarez Navarro | 1-6 6-4 7-6 |
| 2013-06-24 | Wimbledon | R16 | grass | Petra Kvitova | 7-6 6-3 |
| 2012-12-31 | Brisbane | R32 | hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2012-10-01 | Beijing | R32 | hard | Carla Suarez Navarro | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2009-10-12 | Linz | QF | hard | Petra Kvitova | 7-5 6-4 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
1.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
89
66
Break points saved·Dominant
81
29
Break points won·Even
93
96
Deciding sets·Slight edge
90
85
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
94
86
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast