Tomas Berdych vs Nicolas Almagro — Cincinnati Masters Round of 16
Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 14 August 2011 ·
hard
Berdych T.6-2 6-2
Almagro N.
Berdych T.
662
Almagro N.
220
Tomas Berdych defeated Nicolas Almagro 6-2 6-2 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Berdych came in leading the head-to-head 8–4, defending last year's round of 16. Tomas Berdych extended the head-to-head to 9–4.
Key context
- Match story: Tomas Berdych dropped just 4 games past Nicolas Almagro.
Head to head
8–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-10-07 | Shanghai Masters | R16 | hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-7 6-3 7-6 |
| 2012-11-16 | Davis Cup WG F: ESP vs CZE | RR | clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-7 6-3 |
| 2012-10-15 | Stockholm | SF | hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2012-08-27 | US Open | R16 | hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-6 6-4 6-1 |
| 2012-05-13 | Rome Masters | R16 | clay | Tomas Berdych | 7-6 6-3 |
| 2012-03-08 | Indian Wells Masters | R16 | hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-4 6-0 |
| 2012-01-16 | Australian Open | R16 | hard | Tomas Berdych | 4-6 7-6 7-6 7-6 |
| 2011-05-15 | Nice | SF | clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2010-05-16 | Dusseldorf | RR | clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-7 6-4 6-3 |
| 2007-04-15 | Monte Carlo Masters | R64 | clay | Tomas Berdych | 5-0 |
| 2006-07-10 | Bastad | R32 | clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-2 7-6 |
| 2005-07-04 | Bastad | R16 | clay | Tomas Berdych | 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
58%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
78%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Even
8.0
8.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.8
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
84
43
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
82
Break points won·Dominant
82
16
Deciding sets·Clear edge
88
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
85
51
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast