Victoria Azarenka vs Samantha Stosur — Stanford Semi-final
Stanford · WTA · Semi-final
#451WTA
1875ELO
1839Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2010 ·
hard
Azarenka V.6-2 6-3
Stosur S.
Azarenka V.
662
Stosur S.
230
Victoria Azarenka defeated Samantha Stosur 6-2 6-3 in the Stanford semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Victoria Azarenka came in leading the head-to-head 9–1. Victoria Azarenka extended the head-to-head to 10–1.
Key context
- Match story: Victoria Azarenka dropped just 5 games past Samantha Stosur.
Head to head
9–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-20 | Fed Cup WG SF: BLR vs AUS | RR | hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 6-1 |
| 2016-03-07 | Indian Wells | R16 | hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 4-6 6-1 |
| 2013-07-29 | Carlsbad | F | hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2013-05-13 | Rome | QF | clay | Victoria Azarenka | 6-4 1-6 6-3 |
| 2012-08-27 | US Open | QF | hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 4-6 7-6 |
| 2012-02-13 | Doha | F | hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 6-2 |
| 2011-10-26 | Istanbul | RR | clay | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2011-10-24 | WTA Championships | RR | hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2009-03-23 | Miami | QF | hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 6-0 |
| 2008-07-21 | Los Angeles | R16 | hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-4 7-6 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
45%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
46%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.4
3.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (195 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
88
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
64
Break points won·Clear edge
99
76
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
47
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast