Robin Soderling vs David FerrerWimbledon Round of 16

Wimbledon · ATP · Round of 16
42 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWWLWW
3 — 2
Sets
Monday, 21 June 2010 ·
grass
44 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Soderling R.
6-2 5-7 6-2 3-6 7-5
Ferrer D.
Soderling R.
656373
Ferrer D.
272652

Robin Soderling defeated David Ferrer 6-2 5-7 6-2 3-6 7-5 in the Wimbledon round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Robin Soderling came in leading the head-to-head 9–4, defending last year's round of 16. Robin Soderling extended the head-to-head to 10–4.

Key context

  • Match story: Robin Soderling closed it out in five sets, 6–2 5–7 6–2 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

94
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-07-11BastadFclayRobin Soderling6-2 6-2
2010-11-21Tour FinalsRRhardRobin Soderling7-5 7-5
2010-10-31ValenciaSFhardDavid Ferrer6-3 3-6 6-3
2010-10-10Shanghai MastersR16hardRobin Soderling7-5 6-4
2010-10-04BeijingQFhardDavid Ferrer6-2 6-4
2010-07-12BastadSFclayRobin Soderling4-6 6-3 6-2
2009-05-25Roland GarrosR32clayRobin Soderling6-7 7-5 6-2 7-6
2008-07-07BastadQFclayDavid Ferrer7-5 6-7 6-1
2007-05-14Hamburg MastersR32clayDavid Ferrer1-6 6-3 6-2
2007-02-26DubaiR32hardRobin Soderling7-6 6-1
2006-07-10BastadR16clayRobin Soderling6-3 6-1
2004-06-14NottinghamR32grassRobin Soderling7-6 3-6 6-2
2004-03-22Miami MastersR128hardRobin Soderling7-6 6-4

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.1
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
84
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
89
Break points won·Slight edge
74
83
Deciding sets·Slight edge
84
95
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
61
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw