Robin Soderling vs Nikolay Davydenko — Paris Masters Round of 16
Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 16
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 8 November 2009 ·
hard
Soderling R.6-3 3-6 6-4
Davydenko N.
Soderling R.
6362
Davydenko N.
3641
Robin Soderling defeated Nikolay Davydenko 6-3 3-6 6-4 in the Paris Masters round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Robin Soderling came in leading the head-to-head 6–4, defending last year's round of 32. Robin Soderling extended the head-to-head to 7–4.
Key context
- Match story: Robin Soderling closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–4.
Head to head
6–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-02-08 | Rotterdam | SF | hard | Robin Soderling | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2009-11-22 | Tour Finals | RR | hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 7-6 4-6 6-3 |
| 2009-09-28 | Kuala Lumpur | SF | hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 1-6 7-6 6-2 |
| 2009-08-31 | US Open | R16 | hard | Robin Soderling | 7-5 3-6 6-2 |
| 2009-05-25 | Roland Garros | QF | clay | Robin Soderling | 6-1 6-3 6-1 |
| 2007-04-15 | Monte Carlo Masters | R32 | clay | Robin Soderling | 6-4 6-7 6-3 |
| 2007-02-12 | Marseille | R32 | hard | Robin Soderling | 3-6 6-4 6-1 |
| 2006-08-21 | New Haven | SF | hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 7-6 6-2 |
| 2006-04-17 | Monte Carlo Masters | R64 | clay | Robin Soderling | 6-3 2-6 6-4 |
| 2004-08-30 | US Open | R64 | hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-1 2-6 7-5 6-4 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.1
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
70
65
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
76
Break points won·Even
74
78
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
72
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
62
68
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast