Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Tomas Berdych — Canada Masters Round of 64
Canada Masters · ATP · Round of 64
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 August 2009 ·
hard
Kohlschreiber P.7-6 6-7 6-4
Berdych T.
Kohlschreiber P.
7662
Berdych T.
6741
Philipp Kohlschreiber defeated Tomas Berdych 7-6 6-7 6-4 in the Canada Masters round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Berdych came in leading the head-to-head 9–1, defending last year's round of 32. Philipp Kohlschreiber narrowed the head-to-head to 9–2.
Key context
- Match story: Philipp Kohlschreiber edged Tomas Berdych in three tight sets (7–6 6–7 6–4).
Head to head
1–9| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-31 | Doha | R32 | hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-4 7-6 |
| 2016-03-04 | Davis Cup WG R1: GER vs CZE | RR | hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2014-02-24 | Dubai | SF | hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-5 7-5 |
| 2012-01-30 | Montpellier | SF | hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2011-10-03 | Beijing | R16 | hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-2 6-0 |
| 2011-01-17 | Australian Open | R64 | hard | Tomas Berdych | 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-4 |
| 2007-05-20 | Dusseldorf | RR | clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2006-01-02 | Adelaide | QF | hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2005-08-29 | US Open | R128 | hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-6 7-6 6-4 |
| 2005-07-18 | Stuttgart | R32 | grass | Tomas Berdych | 7-6 1-6 6-3 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
8.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
32
84
Break points saved·Even
92
96
Break points won·Dominant
30
82
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
88
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
68
85
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast