Richard Gasquet vs David Ferrer — Canada Masters Round of 16
Canada Masters · ATP · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 July 2008 ·
hard
Gasquet R.6-3 6-3
Ferrer D.
Gasquet R.
662
Ferrer D.
330
Richard Gasquet defeated David Ferrer 6-3 6-3 in the Canada Masters round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — David Ferrer came in leading the head-to-head 10–2, defending last year's round of 32. Richard Gasquet narrowed the head-to-head to 10–3.
Key context
- Match story: Richard Gasquet dropped just 6 games past David Ferrer.
Head to head
2–10| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-03 | Wimbledon | R128 | grass | David Ferrer | 6-3 6-4 5-7 6-2 |
| 2015-05-10 | Rome Masters | R32 | clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2013-09-30 | Beijing | QF | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2013-08-26 | US Open | QF | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-1 4-6 2-6 6-3 |
| 2012-08-27 | US Open | R16 | hard | David Ferrer | 7-5 7-6 6-4 |
| 2012-05-13 | Rome Masters | QF | clay | David Ferrer | 7-6 6-3 |
| 2012-01-16 | Australian Open | R16 | hard | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-4 6-1 |
| 2009-10-11 | Shanghai Masters | R64 | hard | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2009-02-23 | Dubai | SF | hard | David Ferrer | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2007-11-12 | Masters Cup | RR | hard | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-1 |
| 2007-10-01 | Tokyo | F | hard | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-2 |
| 2004-07-12 | Stuttgart | R16 | grass | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.8
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
67
84
Break points saved·Even
93
89
Break points won·Dominant
32
83
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
95
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
94
78
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast