Daniela Hantuchova vs Ai Sugiyama — Zurich Round of 16
Zurich · WTA · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2006 ·
hard
Hantuchova D.7-6 6-2
Sugiyama A.
Hantuchova D.
762
Sugiyama A.
620
Daniela Hantuchova defeated Ai Sugiyama 7-6 6-2 in the Zurich round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ai Sugiyama came in leading the head-to-head 6–4, defending last year's round of 32, but Daniela Hantuchova had been the form player, winning 1 of their last 4 on hard. Daniela Hantuchova narrowed the head-to-head to 6–5.
Key context
- Match story: Daniela Hantuchova closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.
Head to head
4–6| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-06-22 | Wimbledon | R32 | grass | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2008-08-11 | Olympics | R64 | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-2 7-5 |
| 2008-07-14 | Stanford | R16 | hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-3 6-1 |
| 2008-03-24 | Miami | R32 | hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-4 6-7 7-5 |
| 2005-10-17 | Zurich | R32 | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 1-6 7-5 6-4 |
| 2005-08-01 | San Diego | R32 | hard | Ai Sugiyama | 7-5 4-6 6-2 |
| 2004-10-25 | Linz | R16 | hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-2 6-1 |
| 2004-08-02 | Montreal | R32 | hard | Ai Sugiyama | 1-6 6-4 6-4 |
| 2004-06-14 | Eastbourne | QF | grass | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-1 7-6 |
| 2002-07-29 | San Diego | R32 | hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-4 1-6 7-5 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
44%
Service points won·Even
57%
54%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
52%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
5.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
56
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
36
42
Break points won·Slight edge
72
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
54
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
56
47
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About