James Blake vs Andy Roddick — Indianapolis Final
Indianapolis · ATP · Final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2006 ·
hard
Blake J.4-6 6-4 7-6
Roddick A.
Blake J.
4672
Roddick A.
6461
James Blake defeated Andy Roddick 4-6 6-4 7-6 in the Indianapolis final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Andy Roddick came in leading the head-to-head 9–4, defending last year's quarter-final. James Blake narrowed the head-to-head to 9–5.
Key context
- Match story: James Blake dropped the opening set before beating Andy Roddick 4–6 6–4 7–6.
Head to head
4–9| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-08-19 | Winston-Salem | R32 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2011-03-10 | Indian Wells Masters | R64 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2010-02-15 | Memphis | R32 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 4-6 7-6 |
| 2009-06-13 | London | SF | carpet | James Blake | 4-4 |
| 2009-06-08 | Queen's Club | SF | grass | James Blake | 4-4 |
| 2006-06-17 | London | SF | carpet | James Blake | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2006-06-12 | Queen's Club | SF | grass | James Blake | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2005-08-01 | Washington | F | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2003-08-11 | Cincinnati Masters | R16 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 6-2 |
| 2002-10-21 | Basel | R16 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 6-3 |
| 2002-04-22 | Houston | QF | clay | Andy Roddick | 6-2 6-4 |
| 2002-02-25 | San Jose | QF | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2002-02-18 | Memphis | F | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-4 3-6 7-5 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
71%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.9
11.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
37
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
83
Break points won·Clear edge
38
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
88
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About