Francesca Schiavone vs Samantha Stosur — Hasselt Quarter-final
Hasselt · WTA · Quarter-final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2005 ·
hard
Schiavone F.6-3 6-2
Stosur S.
Schiavone F.
662
Stosur S.
320
Francesca Schiavone defeated Samantha Stosur 6-3 6-2 in the Hasselt quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Samantha Stosur came in leading the head-to-head 10–3. Francesca Schiavone narrowed the head-to-head to 10–4.
Key context
- Match story: Francesca Schiavone dropped just 5 games past Samantha Stosur.
Head to head
3–10| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-16 | Gstaad | R32 | clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2014-09-29 | Beijing | R64 | hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2014-03-03 | Indian Wells | R64 | hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2012-09-24 | Tokyo | R32 | hard | Samantha Stosur | 4-6 6-2 7-5 |
| 2012-01-09 | Sydney | R32 | hard | Francesca Schiavone | 6-2 6-4 |
| 2011-05-09 | Rome | QF | clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-2 6-4 |
| 2011-02-05 | Fed Cup WG R1: AUS vs ITA | RR | hard | Francesca Schiavone | 7-6 3-6 7-5 |
| 2010-10-25 | WTA Championships | RR | hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2010-05-24 | Roland Garros | F | clay | Francesca Schiavone | 6-4 7-6 |
| 2009-10-12 | Osaka | F | hard | Samantha Stosur | 7-5 6-1 |
| 2009-05-25 | Roland Garros | R128 | clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2009-03-09 | Indian Wells | R128 | hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2007-05-14 | Rome | R64 | clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-3 6-4 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
56%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
53%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.3
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.7
3.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
34
58
Break points saved·Dominant
28
64
Break points won·Even
80
76
Deciding sets·Clear edge
41
64
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
47
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About