Victor Hanescu vs Albert Montanes — Sopot Round of 32
Sopot · ATP · Round of 32
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 August 2005 ·
clay
Hanescu V.7-6 5-7 6-3
Montanes A.
Hanescu V.
7562
Montanes A.
6731
Victor Hanescu defeated Albert Montanes 7-6 5-7 6-3 in the Sopot round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Albert Montanes came in leading the head-to-head 6–4, defending last year's round of 32, but Victor Hanescu had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 5 on clay. Victor Hanescu narrowed the head-to-head to 6–5.
Key context
- Match story: Victor Hanescu closed it out in three sets, 7–6 5–7 6–3.
Head to head
4–6| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-08-03 | Kitzbuhel | Q2 | clay | Albert Montanes | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2015-08-01 | Kitzbuhel | Q16 | clay | Albert Montanes | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2013-07-28 | Kitzbuhel | R16 | clay | Albert Montanes | 7-6 3-6 7-6 |
| 2013-05-19 | Nice | R16 | clay | Albert Montanes | 7-5 7-6 |
| 2009-11-08 | Paris Masters | R64 | hard | Albert Montanes | 3-6 6-3 7-6 |
| 2008-08-25 | US Open | R128 | hard | Victor Hanescu | 7-6 6-3 2-6 6-3 |
| 2008-03-13 | Indian Wells Masters | R128 | hard | Victor Hanescu | 1-6 6-4 6-4 |
| 2007-09-10 | Bucharest | R16 | clay | Victor Hanescu | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2007-07-16 | Amersfoort | R32 | clay | Victor Hanescu | 7-6 4-6 7-6 |
| 2005-08-29 | US Open | R128 | hard | Albert Montanes | 6-4 3-6 6-3 2-1 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.4
3.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
12
39
Break points saved·Slight edge
70
61
Break points won·Slight edge
9
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
18
74
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
71
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About