Nikolay Davydenko vs Paul Henri Mathieu — RUS vs FRA Round Robin
RUS vs FRA · ATP · Round Robin
3 — 0
Sets
Friday, 15 July 2005 ·
clay
Davydenko N.7-5 6-2 7-5
Henri Mathieu P.
Davydenko N.
7673
Henri Mathieu P.
5250
Nikolay Davydenko defeated Paul Henri Mathieu 7-5 6-2 7-5 in the RUS vs FRA round robin on clay. The result followed the form book — Nikolay Davydenko came in leading the head-to-head 8–4. Nikolay Davydenko extended the head-to-head to 9–4.
Key context
- Match story: Nikolay Davydenko closed it out in three sets, 7–5 6–2 7–5.
Head to head
8–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-03-07 | Indian Wells Masters | R128 | hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 7-6 6-2 |
| 2012-10-22 | Basel | R16 | hard | Paul Henri Mathieu | 6-3 6-7 6-4 |
| 2012-02-13 | Rotterdam | R16 | hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-4 6-7 6-1 |
| 2009-08-10 | Canada Masters | R32 | hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2009-07-19 | Hamburg | F | clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2008-08-11 | Beijing Olympics | R32 | hard | Paul Henri Mathieu | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2007-10-08 | Moscow | F | hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 7-5 7-6 |
| 2007-04-06 | Davis Cup WG QF: RUS vs FRA | RR | clay | Paul Henri Mathieu | 2-6 6-2 6-1 7-5 |
| 2007-01-08 | Sydney | R16 | hard | Paul Henri Mathieu | 6-4 |
| 2005-08-15 | Cincinnati Masters | R32 | hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2000-10-23 | Basel | Q32 | hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2000-05-08 | Germany F3 | R32 | clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-0 4-6 6-4 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Clear edge
68%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
65
19
Break points saved·Even
76
77
Break points won·Dominant
78
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
72
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
26
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About