David Ferrer vs David Nalbandian — Hamburg Masters Round of 64
Hamburg Masters · ATP · Round of 64
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 May 2004 ·
clay
Ferrer D.6-2 6-3
Nalbandian D.
Ferrer D.
662
Nalbandian D.
230
David Ferrer defeated David Nalbandian 6-2 6-3 in the Hamburg Masters round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — David Ferrer came in leading the head-to-head 8–5, defending last year's round of 64. David Ferrer extended the head-to-head to 9–5.
Key context
- Match story: David Ferrer dropped just 5 games past David Nalbandian.
Head to head
8–5| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-02-18 | Buenos Aires | R16 | clay | David Ferrer | 2-6 6-4 6-0 |
| 2012-02-20 | Buenos Aires | SF | clay | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2011-01-10 | Auckland | F | hard | David Ferrer | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2010-08-09 | Canada Masters | R64 | hard | David Nalbandian | 7-5 3-6 6-3 |
| 2008-11-21 | Davis Cup WG F: ARG vs ESP | RR | hard | David Nalbandian | 6-3 6-2 6-3 |
| 2007-10-28 | Paris Masters | QF | hard | David Nalbandian | 7-6 6-7 6-2 |
| 2007-08-27 | US Open | R32 | hard | David Ferrer | 6-3 3-6 4-6 7-6 7-5 |
| 2007-08-05 | Canada Masters | R32 | hard | David Nalbandian | 7-6 6-1 |
| 2007-04-23 | Barcelona | QF | clay | David Ferrer | 7-6 6-2 |
| 2005-03-21 | Miami Masters | R32 | hard | David Ferrer | 7-6 6-1 |
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | David Nalbandian | 7-6 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2003-07-28 | Sopot | R16 | clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 4-6 6-3 |
| 2002-07-15 | Umag | R32 | clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-3 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.6
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
84
66
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
72
Break points won·Clear edge
83
69
Deciding sets·Clear edge
95
79
Tiebreaks·Even
78
82
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About