Radek Stepanek vs Feliciano Lopez — US Open Round of 128
US Open · ATP · Round of 128
3 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 August 2003 ·
hard
Stepanek R.6-4 6-4 6-4
Lopez F.
Stepanek R.
6663
Lopez F.
4440
Radek Stepanek defeated Feliciano Lopez 6-4 6-4 6-4 in the US Open round of 128 on hard. The result followed the form book — Radek Stepanek came in leading the head-to-head 7–4, defending last year's round of 128. Radek Stepanek extended the head-to-head to 8–4.
Key context
- Match story: Radek Stepanek edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4 6–4.
Head to head
7–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-06-14 | London | SF | carpet | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6(7) 6-4 |
| 2014-06-09 | Queen's Club | SF | grass | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2013-01-14 | Australian Open | R64 | hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-2 6-2 6-4 |
| 2011-08-08 | Canada Masters | R64 | hard | Feliciano Lopez | 6-4 4-6 6-4 |
| 2009-04-27 | Rome Masters | R32 | clay | Radek Stepanek | 6-2 6-1 |
| 2008-07-21 | Canada Masters | R64 | hard | Feliciano Lopez | 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2006-05-08 | Rome Masters | R64 | clay | Radek Stepanek | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2005-10-31 | Paris Masters | R32 | hard | Radek Stepanek | 7-5 6-2 |
| 2005-10-10 | Vienna | QF | hard | Radek Stepanek | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2005-01-10 | Sydney | QF | hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2002-12-30 | Doha | R32 | hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-7 6-3 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
32%
Break points saved·Even
62%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
11.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
62
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
96
Break points won·Dominant
49
1
Deciding sets·Even
80
82
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
74
81
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast