Andy Roddick vs Ivan Ljubicic — Hamburg Masters Round of 64
Hamburg Masters · ATP · Round of 64
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2003 ·
clay
Roddick A.6-4 6-4
Ljubicic I.
Roddick A.
662
Ljubicic I.
440
Andy Roddick defeated Ivan Ljubicic 6-4 6-4 in the Hamburg Masters round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Andy Roddick came in leading the head-to-head 6–4, defending last year's round of 16. Andy Roddick extended the head-to-head to 7–4.
Key context
- Match story: Andy Roddick edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.
Head to head
6–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-03-11 | Indian Wells Masters | F | hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2007-03-05 | Indian Wells Masters | QF | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2006-11-13 | Masters Cup | RR | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-4 6-7 6-1 |
| 2005-10-31 | Paris Masters | SF | hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2005-03-04 | Davis Cup WG R1: USA vs CRO | RR | hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 4-6 6-3 7-6 6-7 6-2 |
| 2004-07-19 | Indianapolis | SF | hard | Andy Roddick | 1-6 7-6 7-6 |
| 2003-08-25 | US Open | R64 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-7 6-3 7-6 |
| 2003-08-11 | Cincinnati Masters | R32 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2002-10-28 | Paris Masters | R32 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2002-01-14 | Australian Open | R64 | hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-6 3-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
78%
78%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
56%
51%
Service points won·Even
71%
67%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
65%
64%
Aces / match·Even
11.8
11.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
58
53
Break points saved·Even
83
80
Break points won·Even
21
22
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
82
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
88
76
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About