Sebastien Grosjean vs Andy Roddick — FRA vs USA Round Robin
FRA vs USA · ATP · Round Robin
3 — 1
Sets
Friday, 20 September 2002 ·
clay
Grosjean S.6-4 3-6 6-3 6-4
Roddick A.
Grosjean S.
63663
Roddick A.
46341
Sebastien Grosjean defeated Andy Roddick 6-4 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the FRA vs USA round robin on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Andy Roddick came in leading the head-to-head 10–0. Sebastien Grosjean claimed a first win over Andy Roddick in 11 meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 10–1.
Key context
- Match story: Sebastien Grosjean closed it out in four sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3 6–4.
Head to head
0–10| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-10-16 | Madrid Masters | R32 | clay | Andy Roddick | 6-4 7-6 |
| 2005-06-20 | Wimbledon | QF | grass | Andy Roddick | 3-6 6-2 6-1 3-6 6-3 |
| 2005-06-10 | London | QF | carpet | Andy Roddick | 6-4 7-6(5) |
| 2005-04-18 | Houston | F | clay | Andy Roddick | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2004-06-13 | London | F | carpet | Andy Roddick | 7-6(4) 6-4 |
| 2004-06-07 | Queen's Club | F | grass | Andy Roddick | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2003-08-04 | Canada Masters | R16 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2003-06-15 | London | F | carpet | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2003-06-09 | Queen's Club | F | grass | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2003-03-10 | Indian Wells Masters | R16 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 2-6 7-6 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Clear edge
55%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
71%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
11.7
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
34
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
59
83
Break points won·Dominant
55
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
39
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
59
88
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About