Jarkko Nieminen vs David Nalbandian — Cincinnati Masters Round of 64
Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 64
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2002 ·
hard
Nieminen J.3-6 6-3 6-4
Nalbandian D.
Nieminen J.
3662
Nalbandian D.
6341
Jarkko Nieminen defeated David Nalbandian 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — David Nalbandian came in leading the head-to-head 8–4. Jarkko Nieminen narrowed the head-to-head to 8–5.
Key context
- Match story: Jarkko Nieminen dropped the opening set before beating David Nalbandian 3–6 6–3 6–4.
Head to head
4–8| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-03-20 | Miami Masters | R128 | hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 2-6 6-4 6-3 |
| 2012-01-16 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | David Nalbandian | 6-4 4-2 |
| 2009-01-12 | Sydney | F | hard | David Nalbandian | 6-3 6-7 6-2 |
| 2008-10-06 | Stockholm | SF | hard | David Nalbandian | 6-2 6-1 |
| 2007-03-19 | Miami Masters | R32 | hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-4 7-6 |
| 2006-01-16 | Australian Open | R32 | hard | David Nalbandian | 2-6 6-3 6-2 7-5 |
| 2005-04-25 | Munich | SF | clay | David Nalbandian | 6-3 6-0 |
| 2004-09-13 | Beijing | QF | hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-2 2-6 6-2 |
| 2004-03-01 | Dubai | R32 | hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2003-08-25 | US Open | R64 | hard | David Nalbandian | 5-7 6-3 6-1 4-6 7-6 |
| 2003-08-04 | Canada Masters | R64 | hard | David Nalbandian | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2002-04-08 | Estoril | F | clay | David Nalbandian | 6-4 7-6 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
39
66
Break points saved·Even
74
72
Break points won·Dominant
33
69
Deciding sets·Dominant
48
79
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
71
82
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast