Nicolas Kiefer vs Sebastien Grosjean — Cincinnati Masters Round of 64
Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 64
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 August 1999 ·
hard
Kiefer N.7-5 6-3
Grosjean S.
Kiefer N.
762
Grosjean S.
530
Nicolas Kiefer defeated Sebastien Grosjean 7-5 6-3 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sebastien Grosjean came in leading the head-to-head 5–3, defending last year's round of 64, but Nicolas Kiefer had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 4 on hard. Nicolas Kiefer narrowed the head-to-head to 5–4.
Key context
- Match story: Nicolas Kiefer closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.
Head to head
3–5| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10-26 | Lyon | R32 | clay | Nicolas Kiefer | 4-6 7-6 7-6 |
| 2006-02-10 | Davis Cup WG R1: GER vs FRA | RR | hard | Sebastien Grosjean | 7-5 7-6 6-0 |
| 2006-01-16 | Australian Open | QF | hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 0-6 6-4 6-7 8-6 |
| 2005-05-11 | Hamburg | R32 | clay | Sebastien Grosjean | 2-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2005-05-09 | Hamburg Masters | R32 | clay | Sebastien Grosjean | 2-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2004-03-22 | Miami Masters | R16 | hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2002-08-12 | Indianapolis | R16 | hard | Sebastien Grosjean | 7-6 6-3 |
| 2000-07-10 | Gstaad | R16 | clay | Sebastien Grosjean | 6-3 6-1 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
53%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.5
6.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.8
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
53
34
Break points saved·Slight edge
70
59
Break points won·Even
58
55
Deciding sets·Dominant
65
39
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
59
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast